A Personal Note from Nelson
Last month, I watched a regional manager get criticized for "poor margin performance" - despite actually outperforming the market.
The problem? Traditional P&L reviews can't separate what teams control from external market forces.
This creates a fundamental unfairness that demotivates your best people while missing opportunities to recognize genuine performance breakthroughs.
Today, I'm sharing how Gross Margin Dollar Variance Analysis solves this problem by isolating true team performance from uncontrollable factors.
The Challenge: Your teams get blamed for margin declines they can't control - or credited for improvements they didn't drive.
When margins drop, everyone looks for someone to blame. When they rise, credit goes to whoever speaks loudest. The real drivers remain hidden, leading to:
The Hidden Truth: Many "performance problems" actually come from a mix of factors: some you can't control, like market shifts, rising vendor costs, or changes in customer buying habits. Others you can control, like pricing or inventory decisions. The real challenge is figuring out the root cause of these problems and then finding the right solutions.
A multi-location distributor was struggling with team morale after margin declines led to difficult performance conversations.
The Surface Problem: Margins dropped 2.8% year-over-year across regions, suggesting widespread performance issues.
What Variance Analysis Revealed:
"The Gross Margin Variance tells us what happened, and we weren't able to reflect cost increases in our contract pricing. That's painful, but knowing where the problem is, is a good thing," their operations executive noted after seeing the breakdown.
The Business Impact:
Step 1: Separate Controllable from Uncontrollable Factors - Identify six distinct factors that drive margins: changes in sales volume, customer retention and acquisition, optimizing the product mix, product lifecycle (new and dormant items), effects of pricing policies, and shifts in supplier costs.
Step 2: Measure Teams on What They Can Influence - Focus performance reviews on volume variance (customer engagement), customer variance (retention), pricing execution, and mix variance (cross-selling) - the factors teams actually control.
Step 3: Provide Context for External Factors - Acknowledge product lifecycle and cost variance impacts due to shifts in supplier costs while recognizing teams for performing well despite challenging conditions.
"We could pinpoint whether the change was due to volume, customer loss, or associated costs," a distribution operations executive explained.
Fair Assessment Benefits:
Bottom Line: One client discovered their "underperforming" region had actually contributed over $150K in controllable margin improvements despite adverse market conditions.
Ready to stop penalizing good performers for uncontrollable market forces?
Schedule a Variance Analysis Demo - See how your teams actually perform when external factors are properly isolated.
Looking forward to helping you build fairer, more effective performance measurement systems.
Thank you for your continued partnership with Intuilize. We're committed to delivering value that goes far beyond what meets the eye.
Best regards,
Nelson Valderrama
CEO, Intuilize
Schedule Your Q4 Review to helping you build fairer, more effective performance measurement systems.
Contact us at support@intuilize.com or (469) 844-5505 for any questions. Let’s uncover the full potential of your business together!
© 2025 – PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL